Tag: sport

  • The downfall of the Slazenger cricket bat

    The bat made for greats, now the cheap beginner’s favourite

    Slazenger is a brand etched into sporting history, once known for its high-quality sporting equipment across a diverse range of sports. During their long prestigious history, they have been one of the leading brands at many world events. These include: the official Wimbledon tennis ball supplier since 1902 and 1966 FIFA World Cup ball manufacturer. Slazenger has also sponsored many high-profile cricketers, golfers and hockey players. However, in recent years they have been seen on television less and less with big names choosing other bat brands. Why is this? Well in this article all will be uncovered.

    The history of the Slazenger cricket bat (The rise and peak)

    Slazenger was established in 1881 by Ralph and Albert Slazenger and made cricket equipment from the very start. However, in the late 1920s and early 30s the brand really took off cricket wise and became recognisable on the cricketing world stage. The driving force for this rise was smart sponsorship deals specifically, Sir Donald Bradman. The publicity he brought was game changing. As a result, many began choosing Slazenger bats for their quality.  During its peak, Sir Garfield Sobers, Geoffry Boycott, Rohan Kanhai, Sir Viv Richards and Sir Len Hutton all used Slazenger. The brand stayed popular throughout the 20th Century.

    The silent disappearance from the professional scene

    In the 2000s and early 2010s Slazenger still had some big names such as Ian Bell, Eoin Morgan, Jimmy Anderson, Jonny Bairstow, Jason Roy, Steve Smith and Jacques Kallis. However, in this period Slazenger was bought by Mike Ashley in 2003 and the brand was soon dumped on the shelves of Sports Direct and left to lose relevance. Jason Roy cut ties with Slazenger in 2018 and since then they have made no deals with quality talents.

    Reasons for the downfall

    Firstly, I would not like to try not to pin the downfall all on Mike Ashley and Sports Direct. However, it is undeniable that many of the reasons for the demise of the Slazenger cricket bat could have easily been avoided with a little more attention towards the brand.

    Change of direction

    In recent years, Slazenger has moved towards making cheaper lower quality bats. They haven’t made any bats fit for top professionals since about 2019 and have instead made bats for beginners and low-level village cricketers. Currently, Slazenger’s bats are popular among beginners because of the price, with some as cheap as about £15. Whilst it is sad to see such a historic brand being so neglected, I cannot be too frustrated as it gets people into cricket. My first bat was a bargain blade Slazenger from Sports Direct and whilst it was terrible it was what started my cricketing journey, and I know this is the same for many others. 

    Lack of big-name partnerships

    Considering Slazenger rose to the top due to smart sponsorship deals, it baffles me how they have not signed any professionals let alone big names. I always remember watching players like Ben Stokes with his GM and thinking he’s incredible, I wish I could have a bat like him. However, Slazenger do not have any ambassadors for their bats and without this people don’t desire to use them. Due to this, the bats have become lesser known.

    Mike Ashley’s priorities and the little room allocated for Slazenger bats in Sports Direct  

    The simple matter of the fact is big companies will priorities what makes them more money and Mike Ashley is no exception with how he runs Sports Direct. Football is bigger than cricket so obviously makes Sports Direct more money. When you walk into the shop their focuses are clear. Depending on the size of the store the size of the section can differ but there are often hundreds of different football boots, but you will be lucky to find three different types of Slazenger bat. The football section typically has a large wall for boots at the front of the upstairs and plenty of other space for balls, kits and other football related things. The cricket section can take some finding though and is often tucked away in a corner and can often only be two meters wide and mixed in with other sports such as golf and hockey. The same tactics for manufacturing are applied meaning cricket bats are ignored, resulting in poor quality and cheap goods.

    The rise of modern cricket brands

    For some to rise others must fall and this would be correct in the case of Slazenger cricket. Many more modern bats brands are fully fledged to making cricket bats. This means they can afford to spend all their time, energy and resources on developing new technologies, designs and making bats whereas, Slazenger often has to split this between clothing and lots of other sports. These brands are also seen as elite and high quality, which in truth they are, compared to Slazenger.

    Lower quality Willow

    Slazenger claims “Handmade using the highest quality willow to ensure each bat sold in the UK has been carefully crafted to create the best possible performance, used by some of the world’s best players.” However, many of Slazenger’s bats are made from cheaper lower performance Kashmir willow. Whilst they do make some more expensive English willow bats, in my experience they are typically never found in Sports Direct stores and can only be found online.  Their bats are usually made from Grade 3 or Grade 4 with the odd Grade 2 willow bat, providing a less aesthetic look. We also know from earlier in the article Slazenger is currently not used by any superstar cricketers.

    Can they make a recovery   

    Overall, I think they could get back to the top of the sport if they wanted to. However, Slazenger cricket bats are clearly not in Mike Ashley’s personal interests. This can be especially seen by the lack of area allocated in his Sports Direct stores and the continued underdevelopment of the bats. To make a recovery Slazenger needs big changes but these are unlikely to happen.

  • Test cricket is broken, time to get out of your comfort zone and accept the necessary change

    Why a tiered Test system is right

    Reconnect the fans

    Test cricket is getting less popular each year. It is only facts that younger fans are hooked by floodlit white ball games with sixes flying to all parts of the ground. They consider leaves, blocks and singles boring, but this is the true identity of the sport. In an era of BazBall we should be grateful considering some had to watch a 10-day timeless Test end in a draw. However, lower interest in the format is not just younger people perceiving Test cricket as less exciting and entertaining. It stems from the fact the Test format makes no sense not just for younger people but for casual fans as well. The current ICC Test World Championship system is very hard to understand. What do you mean some teams play more matches than other?, How come there is 12 test nation but only 9 in the world test championship?, How is a team with 4 wins lower than a team with 1?, Why don’t all Tests count? and How do some teams play against some regularly but have barley played against others?

    This confusion creates a lack of interest as it is hard to get into and follow. However, a tiered Test system like the English football pyramid would be much easier to understand. Each team plays everyone a certain number of times, 6 in the first division, 6 in the second and promotion and relegation, a simple concept but it could make all the difference. Everyone can support their country, egging them on to win.

    Increased competitiveness

    A tiered system means nations can play against other countries their level. If you’re not good enough you go down, if your too good you go up. This means there is no demolition jobs on smaller nations because that isn’t helpful for anyone. As shown in the World Cup many associate nations are holding their own against the big boys and it would be a missed opportunity not to include them in this. The best associates could make up a third division this would allow them to improve at a much faster rate. Currently they are good, but they will never get to the next level without playing against test nations. This has been shown in Asia with the Asia Cup allowing Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Bangladesh to get exposure against Full member nations which helped them to improve and gain Test status. The top one or two teams not in the system could also get promoted.     

    More revenue

    Everyone having a chance to become a Test nation means more people from around the world would want to get involved in cricket. This surge of increased interest would draw views from countries not considered cricket playing Scotland, Netherlands and Namibia and therefore make the most prestigious format hit heights never seen before. These heights would then generate more revenue reinvigorating the format.  

    Why many fans disagree?

    Even considering these benefits many are thoroughly against this because of the history behind some series and teams. Classic Test cricket fans are often against this as they wouldn’t like to see a country like the West Indies in a low division because of their terrifying pace throughout the 80s and the history behind them. Many cricket fans also cannot accept the possibility of the big three being in division 2 or 3 because it is embarrassing and goes against tradition. People also would not be happy if Australia, India or England lost power as it would lose money, power and influence and other fans worry smaller nations will not have the funds to cope. Finally, the fear of losing historic series such as the Ashes outweighs the excitement of new rivalries. In my opinion, cricket fans need to take a good look at themselves and realise we are hanging on to the unsustainable past and need to move on. We shouldn’t be looking at teams and going they can’t be in division 2 because they were good in the 80s and start thinking they’re good now so they should be at the top. We shouldn’t worry about losing big series either as it could work both ways and they could occur more often. Relegation scraps and promotion races can create even better rivalries like the Arsenal V Man City title race rivalry. And that is why if the tiered test system is implemented correctly, it could be amazing for reinvigorating the Test format